Members of the European Parliament approved the proposal in Strasbourg on 15 September by 583 votes to 49, with 39 abstentions.
The measures would temporarily suspend customs duties on numerous Armenian products for two years and establish duty-free quotas for eight agricultural categories, including grapes, apricots, cherries, peaches and cucumbers. According to Armenian reporting on the European proposal, the measures could liberalise around 80% of Armenian exports to the EU.

The initiative is directly connected to Armenia’s changing external trade environment.
Russia has traditionally been one of Armenia’s most important markets, particularly for food, agricultural products, beverages and processed goods. Recent Russian trade restrictions have disrupted that relationship, hitting categories where Armenian producers have historically relied heavily on Russian demand.

According to the European institutions, almost all Armenian exports of fruit, vegetables and plants to Russia have been affected by the restrictions, alongside more than 91% of beverages and spirits.”

EuroAsia.News, reporting from Yerevan

For a relatively small economy, losing reliable access to a major established market can have consequences far beyond headline trade figures.
Agricultural exporters work with harvest cycles and perishable products. Wine and spirits producers build distribution networks over years. Small manufacturers often lack the capital needed to redirect products rapidly toward new countries.
The EU measures are designed partly as an economic bridge while Armenian companies develop alternative markets.

They are not yet fully in force.
The European Parliament has approved its position, while formal Council approval and publication in the EU’s Official Journal remain necessary before the regulation takes effect. The Council had already endorsed the Commission’s proposal without changes on 2 September, making final implementation considerably closer.

Tariff removal alone, however, will not automatically transform Armenian exports.
Selling agricultural products, food and beverages into the European Union requires compliance with European sanitary, phytosanitary, labelling and product standards. Companies also need logistics networks, distributors and sufficient production capacity.
For some Armenian producers, meeting those requirements could initially prove more difficult than paying tariffs.

Yet that challenge also illustrates why the agreement could have longer-term consequences.
Greater access to the European market gives Armenian businesses an incentive to upgrade production standards and certification. Once those requirements are met, companies are no longer limited to one national market but can potentially reach consumers across the EU’s single market.
The development should also be understood within Armenia’s broader diversification strategy rather than simply as the replacement of Russia by Europe.

Traditionally almost all fruits were exported to Russia. Now it needs to find a buyer in Europe.
Traditionally almost all fruits were exported to Russia. Now it needs to find a buyer in Europe.

Armenia remains economically connected to Russia through trade, energy, labour flows and membership in the Eurasian Economic Union. Those connections cannot be dismantled or replaced quickly, nor has every Armenian sector sought to do so.
At the same time, Yerevan has increasingly expanded economic and political engagement with the European Union, the United States, Iran and other partners.

The new EU trade measures accelerate that diversification.
Their immediate objective is relatively straightforward: provide Armenian producers with alternative market access following disruption to traditional exports.

Their longer-term effect could be more structural.
If Armenian companies successfully use the temporary tariff window to establish European customers, improve standards and build new distribution networks, some of the resulting trade relationships may continue long after the emergency measures expire. However, the same was said to East European food producers, and how many eastern European food products you have in western Europe?